Journal article
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, 2021
APA
Click to copy
Maclean, M., Kureshi, N., Shankar, J., Stewart, S., & Christie, S. D. (2021). Modic changes and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar surgery for disc herniation. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Maclean, M., N. Kureshi, J. Shankar, S. Stewart, and SD Christie. “Modic Changes and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Surgery for Disc Herniation.” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques (2021).
MLA
Click to copy
Maclean, M., et al. “Modic Changes and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Surgery for Disc Herniation.” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques, 2021.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{m2021a,
title = {Modic changes and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar surgery for disc herniation},
year = {2021},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques},
author = {Maclean, M. and Kureshi, N. and Shankar, J. and Stewart, S. and Christie, SD}
}
Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a risk factor for Modic change (MC) development on spinal MRI. MC has been associated with worse pre- and post-operative pain, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We examined the relationship between pre-operative MC and post-operative assessment scores for patients receiving discectomy (LD) or transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) for LDH. Methods: We reviewed 285 primary single-level surgeries. Pre-operative and 12-month post-operative assessment scores: Visual Analog Scale Leg-Pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short-Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36-PCS). MC subgroup on pre-operative MRI was recorded by a single neuroradiologist. Results: 179 patients were included. The sample prevalence of MC on pre-operative MRI was 62%; MC2 was most common (35%). No differences in pre-operative scores were identified, regardless of present or absent MC. For the overall cohort, improvement in assessment scores were observed: SF-36 improved an average of 8.2 points (95% CI: [5.8, 10.7]), ODI by 11.3 points (95% CI: [8.7, 14.0]), and VAS by 2.8 points (95% CI: [2.1, 3.5]). In nearly all cases, MCID values were met. Conclusions: Clinically significant improvement in post-operative pain, disability, and HRQoL was observed for both procedures. Modic change on pre-operative MRI was not associated with worse clinical assessment scores.